Micro-Interview Series

Episode
#05

From Static Lineups to Dynamic Systems

Micro-Interview Series •
182
 words
Hadi Sotudeh
Football Analytics Doctoral Student
ETH Zürich

Introduction

Doctoral student at ETH Zürich working on dynamic tactical formation identification from tracking data. He is also the teaching assistant for the university's Soccer Analytics course.

He’s earned recognition from PSG, Manchester City, and the Bundesliga through top finishes at major sports analytics challenges.

In this interview, Hadi breaks down what formation analysis really means and why it matters for clubs and analysts.

Let’s get into it.

Your research dives deep into dynamic formation detection. Can you explain what’s the practical impact of this work for clubs and analysts, in a way that won’t make our heads spin? 🙂

The primary purpose is match analysis, focusing on how a team’s spatial organization evolves throughout a game in relation to key factors such as phases of play, scoreline, substitutions, red cards, and stoppages. These insights are also valuable for clubs in recruiting players or coaches and for media coverage.

What’s one nuance or challenge about formation detection that’s often overlooked in day-to-day football analysis?

Starting line-up formations are merely analyst predictions that vary by source and are not fixed, as they change throughout the match. Moreover, determining who is right or wrong is challenging due to the absence of ground truth labels. In my view, alternative approaches are needed to evaluate formation identification methods, as discussed in detail in my survey paper.

If a club wants to better understand its own tactical identity through data, where should they start?

They can reach out to me 😉

https://www.linkedin.com/in/hadisotudeh/

Reflections

What struck me in this interview with Hadi is how fragile the “formation” concept really is. Clubs, analysts, and even fans tend to think in static categories like 4-3-3, 4-4-2, etc. but reality on the pitch is far more fluid. What Hadi highlights is that tactical identity can’t be captured in one snapshot. It evolves with substitutions, phases of play, even single red cards. For me, that’s a reminder: if football data is this dynamic, then the same must hold true for CRM and fan data. Clubs can’t rely on static segments or assumptions. They need systems that adapt as reality changes on the pitch and off it.

Enjoyed this? Follow us fore more sharp takes.

Matthias Werner
👉 The CRM guy for football clubs.
Follow me

Want to get featured?

I’m curating micro-interviews with smart voices shaping football and business — think about data, strategy, and systems.

If you're doing sharp work in football, analytics, CRM, or tech-enabled ops, I’d love to hear your take.

Just drop me a message!

Looking forward,
Matthias 👋
Let's connect: